|
January 24, 2000
Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305)
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane
Room 1061
Rockville, MD 20852
Re Docket No. 97N-0511
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP); Procedures for the Safe
and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Juice; Availability of New Data and
Information and Reopening of Comment Period.
64 FR, 65669 (November 23, 1999)
Dear Sir or Madam:
Current Systems for Thermal Processing
IDFA does not support mandatory HACCP for juice products from concentrates or beverages that
use juice as an ingredient which are processed by the dairy industry. Although concern about
the safety of fresh juices and related products is warranted, mandatory HACCP for all juice
products is not necessary. The dairy industry utilizes its fluid milk processing systems to
produce juices from concentrates and juice drink products. These systems include both food
safety and quality components such as pasteurization, Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) and
other programs mandated by FDA and the National Conference on Interstate Milk Shipments (NCIMS)
through the Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO) (FDA, 1995). The milk industry has a long
established history of safe production of dairy and juice products and as a result there is high
consumer confidence in these products.
These comments are submitted on behalf of the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA),
and its constituent organizations, the Milk Industry Foundation, the International Ice Cream
Association, and the National Cheese Institute. The approximately 850 member companies of these
associations operate more than 1550 processing and manufacturing plants, which account for 85%
of dairy products consumed in the United States. IDFA's members produce approximately 10% of
all juice and juice drinks and 30% of the total orange juice manufactured from concentrate in
the U.S.
Dairy processors have historically applied the strict regulations mandated for dairy products
to the processing of drinks made from juice and juice concentrates. Current systems include
pasteurization and programs outlined by NCIMS and GMPs as stated in the Code of Federal
Regulation, 21 CFR Part 110.
The PMO mandates specific requirements for temperature controls, recording instruments,
equipment design, testing and inspections for pasteurization. The following is an overview of
high temperature, short time (HTST) pasteurization used by the majority of dairy processors for
juice. The residence time of the product in the inclined holding tube is determined by the
timing device. Temperature records (charts) are maintained in agreement with the indicating
thermometer, which must have an accuracy of ± 0.5°F. If the temperature of the product does not
meet the mandated pasteurization temperature, the product is diverted back to the constant level
tank via the flow diversion valve. Pasteurization temperatures and times are automatically
recorded by the record controller, which also activates the flow diversion valve when necessary.
Pasteurized product is pumped upwards past a vacuum break that prevents cross-contamination with
unpasteurized product. To ensure proper settings, FDA inspectors verify and seal the timing
device and recorder controller to ensure proper holding time. These requirements are also
described in Milk Pasteurization Controls and Tests (FDA, 1998). Time/temperature requirements
for the pasteurization of milk are found in the PMO and 21 CFR 131.3:
| Temperature (°F) | Time |
| 1451 | 30 minutes |
| 1611 | 15 seconds |
| 191 | 1 second |
| 1942 | 0.5 second |
| 2012 | 0.1 second |
| 204 | 0.05 second |
| 212 | 0.01 second |
1If the dairy ingredient has a fat content of 10% or more, or if it contains added
sweeteners, the specified temperature shall be increased by 5°F.
2Additional pasteurization temperatures are provided by the PMO, 1995.
Processing measures employed by the dairy industry are more than adequate to assure the
elimination of pathogens in juice drinks. Specifically, the higher acidity of juices and juice
drinks results in higher lethality during pasteurization (Banwart, 1989). Unlike milk, which
focuses on the elimination of pathogens, the targets of pasteurization for fruit juice in the
past have been the inactivation of enzymes and reduction in spoilage organisms (Fellows, 1996).
Application of 5-log Reduction
IDFA interprets the proposed rule to mean that a 5-log reduction in pathogens may occur at
any step in the production of juice and juice beverages. As long as the juice ingredients have
been subjected to the required reduction, either before or after blending, the product would be
safe. This reduction should not necessarily have to occur immediately prior to final packaging.
Juice ingredients used by dairies to manufacture juice beverages generally receive a 5-log
reduction in pathogens by the supplier. Pasteurization at the dairy facility often occurs in
addition to this 5-log reduction and therefore would not be subject to the mandatory HACCP
program proposed by this regulation.
Percentage Juice
IDFA believes that the proposed rule should include a minimum percent juice for which this
rule will apply. Minute percentages of juice do not pose a health threat particularly when the
concept of hurdle technology is applied to the food. It is IDFA's position that the proposed
regulations should not apply to products containing low levels of juice when GMPs are employed
in combination with preservatives, temperature, pH, and/or pasteurization. Full-strength juices
should be the target of the proposed rule due to their link to outbreaks of foodborne illness.
Mandatory HACCP and a 5-log reduction in pathogens would be burdensome and unnecessary for
processors manufacturing drinks with low levels of juice and discourage the incorporation of
small amounts of juice to enhance products. IDFA would invite the opportunity to discuss with
FDA the concept of a minimum percent juice exemption.
IDFA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed regulation and would welcome the
opportunity to discuss these issues. We would be glad to answer any questions or provide any
additional information.
Respectfully submitted,
Cary Frye
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
References
Banwart, G. J. 1989. Control of microorganisms by destruction, ch. 12. Basic Food
Microbiology, 2nd ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Fellows, P. J. 1996. Pasteurization, ch. 10. Food Processing Technology: Principles
and Practice. Woodhead Publishing, Ltd., Cambridge.
Food and Drug Administration. 1995. Grade "A" Pasteurized Milk Ordinance, 1995 Revision.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Food and Drug Administration. 1998. Milk Pasteurization Controls and Tests, 7th ed.
Division of Human Resource Development, State Training Branch.
|